On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:04:56AM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 28.10.2015 v 10:54 Johan Hovold napsal(a):
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> Should have acked this message...
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>
> >>> This effectively reverts 932058a5d5f9 ("coccinelle: misc: semantic patch
> >>> to delete overly complex return code processing").
> >>>
> >>> There can be both symmetry and readability reasons for not wanting to do
> >>> the final function call as part of the return statement and to maintain
> >>> a clear separation of success and error paths.
> >>>
> >>> Since this is in no way mandated by the coding standard, let's just
> >>> remove this semantic patch to avoid having "clean up" patches being
> >>> posted over and over in response to these Coccinelle warnings.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jo...@kernel.org>
> >
> > Is anyone planning on picking this patch up?
>
> It is already in kbuild.git as commit 1a617a8475e8, I apparenly forgot
> to reply to this thread.
Ok, great.
Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
