On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer > >> that doesn't seem what most people agree with. > > > > "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be > > Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but > > are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far > > that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that > > agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition) > > Reviewers -- go figure. > > > > I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :) > If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that > maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any > problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review. > > In that case, that would be: > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
Thanks Krzysztof, but I'm going to drop this patch. I can see it causing more issues than it'll solve. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
