On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:47PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> rcu_dereference_raw() calls indirectly rcu_read_lock_held() while
> rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() does not so fix the comment about the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
Good eyes! Queued for 4.5, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 581abf8..931d627 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
> * The tracing infrastructure traces RCU (we want that), but unfortunately
> * some of the RCU checks causes tracing to lock up the system.
> *
> - * The tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call
> + * The no-tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call
> * rcu_read_lock_held().
> */
> #define rcu_dereference_raw_notrace(p) __rcu_dereference_check((p), 1, __rcu)
> --
> 2.5.0.rc3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
