On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30-10-15, 15:18, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> A side-note. I wonder if it would be better style to have the >> node name be: >> >> opp@600000000 { > > I thought the @... had a special meaning and we might end up creating > some device for the node then? Perhaps I am mistaken.
There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception here. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/