On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:37PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:25 -0700
> Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
[...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c 
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > index dcb1f7f4873f..850546dc98c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_init(struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv)
> >     /* Fill in fsl_elbc_mtd structure */
> >     priv->mtd.priv = chip;
> >     priv->mtd.dev.parent = priv->dev;
> > +   chip->flash_node = priv->dev->of_node;
> 
> Shouldn't we use the nand_set_flash_node() helper here? Here is a diff 
> replacing
> all 'chip->flash_node =' occurrences by nand_set_flash_node():

Hmm, I don't know why I overlooked those. I think maybe I did the
initial replacement before this patch and forgot to do the same
replacement on my subsequent work. I guess that's what happens when I
rebase/rework too much...

Thanks for the diff. I'll probably squash it into v3 if/when that comes.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to