Hi Jiri,

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:40:55AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 04:18:29PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> >     while (rb_node) {
> > -           double percent;
> > -
> >             chain = rb_entry(rb_node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
> > -           percent = chain->hit * 100.0 / total_samples;
> >  
> > -           ret = percent_color_fprintf(fp, "           %6.2f%%\n", 
> > percent);
> > +           ret += fprintf(fp, "           ");
> > +           ret += callchain_node__fprintf_value(chain, fp, total_samples);
> > +           ret += fprintf(fp, "\n");
> >             ret += __callchain__fprintf_flat(fp, chain, total_samples);
> >             ret += fprintf(fp, "\n");
> >             if (++entries_printed == callchain_param.print_limit)
> > @@ -294,12 +294,11 @@ static size_t callchain__fprintf_folded(FILE *fp, 
> > struct rb_root *tree,
> >     struct rb_node *rb_node = rb_first(tree);
> >  
> >     while (rb_node) {
> > -           double percent;
> >  
> >             chain = rb_entry(rb_node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
> > -           percent = chain->hit * 100.0 / total_samples;
> >  
> > -           ret += fprintf(fp, "%.2f%% ", percent);
> > +           ret += callchain_node__fprintf_value(chain, fp, total_samples);
> > +           ret += fprintf(fp, " ");
> 
> hum, the callchain_node__fprintf_value gets hits as callchain_cumul_hits(node)
> which is 'node->hit + node->children_hit'
> 
> while the replaced code took only 'chain->hit'
> 
> not sure now which one we actualy want here..

Right, this is somewhat confusing..

AFAICS cumul_hits is used for other output mode, but for folded output
we should use hit without children_hit.

I added the check to use count in patch 4/4 but missed to use hit.
Will update.

Thanks,
Namhyung



> 
> >             ret += __callchain__fprintf_folded(fp, chain);
> >             ret += fprintf(fp, "\n");
> >             if (++entries_printed == callchain_param.print_limit)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
> > index 08cb220ba5ea..44184d198855 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
> > @@ -805,6 +805,31 @@ char *callchain_list__sym_name(struct callchain_list 
> > *cl,
> >     return bf;
> >  }
> >  
> > +char *callchain_node__sprintf_value(struct callchain_node *node,
> > +                               char *bf, size_t bfsize, u64 total)
> > +{
> > +   double percent = 0.0;
> > +   u64 cumul = callchain_cumul_hits(node);
> > +
> > +   if (total)
> > +           percent = cumul * 100.0 / total;
> > +
> > +   scnprintf(bf, bfsize, "%6.2f%%", percent);
> > +   return bf;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int callchain_node__fprintf_value(struct callchain_node *node,
> > +                            FILE *fp, u64 total)
> > +{
> > +   double percent = 0.0;
> > +   u64 cumul = callchain_cumul_hits(node);
> > +
> > +   if (total)
> > +           percent = cumul * 100.0 / total;
> > +
> > +   return percent_color_fprintf(fp, "%.2f%%", percent);
> > +}
> 
> SNIP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to