From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]> Now that max_stack_lock is a global variable, it requires a naming convention that is unlikely to collide. Rename it to the same naming convention that the other stack_trace variables have.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> --- include/linux/ftrace.h | 2 +- kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h index b4c92ab9e08b..eae6548efbf0 100644 --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ struct stack_trace; extern unsigned stack_trace_index[]; extern struct stack_trace stack_trace_max; extern unsigned long stack_trace_max_size; -extern arch_spinlock_t max_stack_lock; +extern arch_spinlock_t stack_trace_max_lock; extern int stack_tracer_enabled; void stack_trace_print(void); diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c index 50945a7939f4..0bd212af406c 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct stack_trace stack_trace_max = { }; unsigned long stack_trace_max_size; -arch_spinlock_t max_stack_lock = +arch_spinlock_t stack_trace_max_lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, trace_active); @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ void stack_trace_print(void) /* * When arch-specific code overides this function, the following - * data should be filled up, assuming max_stack_lock is held to + * data should be filled up, assuming stack_trace_max_lock is held to * prevent concurrent updates. * stack_trace_index[] * stack_trace_max @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack) return; local_irq_save(flags); - arch_spin_lock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_lock(&stack_trace_max_lock); /* In case another CPU set the tracer_frame on us */ if (unlikely(!frame_size)) @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack) } out: - arch_spin_unlock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_unlock(&stack_trace_max_lock); local_irq_restore(flags); } @@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ stack_max_size_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf, cpu = smp_processor_id(); per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)++; - arch_spin_lock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_lock(&stack_trace_max_lock); *ptr = val; - arch_spin_unlock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_unlock(&stack_trace_max_lock); per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)--; local_irq_restore(flags); @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void *t_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) cpu = smp_processor_id(); per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)++; - arch_spin_lock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_lock(&stack_trace_max_lock); if (*pos == 0) return SEQ_START_TOKEN; @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static void t_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p) { int cpu; - arch_spin_unlock(&max_stack_lock); + arch_spin_unlock(&stack_trace_max_lock); cpu = smp_processor_id(); per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)--; -- 2.6.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
