Andreas,

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Andreas Dilger <adil...@dilger.ca> wrote:
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ richacl_alloc(int count, gfp_t gfp)
>>       struct richacl *acl = kzalloc(size, gfp);
>>
>>       if (acl) {
>> -             atomic_set(&acl->a_refcount, 1);
>> +             atomic_set(&acl->a_base.ba_refcount, 1);
>>               acl->a_count = count;
>>       }
>>       return acl;
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ richacl_clone(const struct richacl *acl, gfp_t gfp)
>>
>>       if (dup) {
>>               memcpy(dup, acl, size);
>> -             atomic_set(&dup->a_refcount, 1);
>> +             atomic_set(&dup->a_base.ba_refcount, 1);
>
> These two calls should be base_acl_init().

Yes. This should all be fixed in the next snapshot.

Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to