On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:22:32 -0500 Josef Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fix up a stray ecryptfs_copy_attr_all call and remove prototypes for > ecryptfs_copy_* as they no longer exist. > > Signed-off-by: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c | 2 +- > fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c b/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c > index 52d1e36..b0352d8 100644 > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_d_revalidate(struct > struct inode *lower_inode = > ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(dentry->d_inode); > > - ecryptfs_copy_attr_all(dentry->d_inode, lower_inode); > + fsstack_copy_attr_all(dentry->d_inode, lower_inode, NULL); I fixed that two weeks ago. When your patches are queued in -mm please do test them there, and review others' changes to them, and raise patches against them. Raising patches against one's private tree and not testing the code which is planned to be merged can introduce errors. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
