2015-11-05 21:20 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:11:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2015-11-05 20:28 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>:
>
>> > The dependency is on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST which is not the same as
>> > ARCH_SUNXI.
>
>> The compile test of this driver should pass even if RESET_CONTROLLER
>> is not defined.
>> So, it does not matter for COMPILE_TEST.
>
> If that is the case then the change here is that the dependency on
> RESET_CONTROLLER is just redundant which isn't what the commit message
> says.
For compile test, right, "depends on RESET_CONTROLLER" is
redundant in the first place.
For run-time on real SoCs,the driver failed at the following point
without the reset-controller sub-system.
sspi->rstc = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(sspi->rstc)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't get reset controller\n");
ret = PTR_ERR(sspi->rstc);
goto err_free_master;
}
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
