4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Seth Jennings <[email protected]> commit 2900ea609616c2651dec65312beeb2a6e536bc50 upstream. In commit 7d375bffa524 ("sb_edac: Fix support for systems with two home agents per socket") NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was renumerated to handle EN, EP, and EX configurations. The *_mci_bind_devs() functions - except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() - got a new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask. However, sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop. With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since SB only has 4 TADs. This results in the following error on SB machines: EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as well. After this patch: EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED) EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED) Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <[email protected]> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> Cc: linux-edac <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c @@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct { struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info; struct pci_dev *pdev; + u8 saw_chan_mask = 0; int i; for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) { @@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct { int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0; pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev; + saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id; } break; case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO: @@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct !pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras || !pvt->pci_ta) goto enodev; - for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) { - if (!pvt->pci_tad[i]) - goto enodev; - } + if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f) + goto enodev; return 0; enodev: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
