On 2015/11/06, 10:19, "Shivani Bhardwaj" <shivanib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Remove the prototype of function cfs_trace_free_string_buffer() as it is >no longer needed. These patches would be a lot more useful if the summary contained the name of the function being removed, rather than "remove function prototype" and variations of that. Something like: staging: lustre: remove cfs_trace_free_string_buffer prototype staging: lustre: remove ldlm_pool_set_limit wrapper staging: lustre: remove ldlm_pool_get_limit wrapper Not sure if that is grounds for rejection of this patch series (I'll leave that up to Dan and Greg), but definitely something for future patches. Cheers, Andreas >Signed-off-by: Shivani Bhardwaj <shivanib...@gmail.com> >--- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h >b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h >index 73d60e0..ba62005 100644 >--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h >+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h >@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ int cfs_trace_copyin_string(char *knl_buffer, int >knl_buffer_nob, > int cfs_trace_copyout_string(char __user *usr_buffer, int usr_buffer_nob, > const char *knl_str, char *append); > int cfs_trace_allocate_string_buffer(char **str, int nob); >-void cfs_trace_free_string_buffer(char *str, int nob); > int cfs_trace_dump_debug_buffer_usrstr(void __user *usr_str, int >usr_str_nob); > int cfs_trace_daemon_command(char *str); > int cfs_trace_daemon_command_usrstr(void __user *usr_str, int >usr_str_nob); >-- >2.1.0 > > Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Software Architect Intel High Performance Data Division -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
