On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Paolo pointed out that enter_from_user_mode could be called while
>> irqflags were traced as though IRQs were on.
>>
>> In principle, this could confuse lockdep. It doesn't cause any
>> problems that I've seen in any configuration, but if I build with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y, enable a nohz_full CPU, and add code like:
>>
>> if (irqs_disabled()) {
>> spin_lock(&something);
>> spin_unlock(&something);
>> }
>>
>> to the top of enter_from_user_mode, then lockdep will complain
>> without this fix. It seems that lockdep's irqflags sanity checks
>> are too weak to detect this bug without forcing the issue.
>>
>> This patch adds one byte to normal kernels, and it's IMO a bit ugly.
>> I haven't spotted a better way to do this yet, though. The issue is
>> that we can't do TRACE_IRQS_OFF until after SWAPGS (if needed), but
>> we're also supposed to do it before calling C code.
>
> I would not mind to have that explanation in the code itself so that
> people don't scratch heads why the duplicated TRACE_IRQS_OFF call.
>
Done for v2.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
