* Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote:

> On CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING kernels that have context tracking
> disabled at runtime (which includes most distro kernels), we still
> have the overhead of a call to enter_from_user_mode in interrupt and
> exception entries.
> 
> If jump labels are available, this uses the jump label
> infrastructure to skip the call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/calling.h  | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S |  8 ++------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
> index 3c71dd947c7b..271e30c585bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +
>  /*
>  
>   x86 function call convention, 64-bit:
> @@ -232,3 +234,16 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is 
> built with
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>  
> +/*
> + * This does 'call enter_from_user_mode' unless we can avoid it based on
> + * kernel config or using the static jump infrastructure.
> + */
> +.macro CALL_ENTER_FROM_USER_MODE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> +     STATIC_JUMP_IF_FALSE .Lafter_call_\@, context_tracking_enabled, def=0
> +#endif
> +     call enter_from_user_mode
> +.Lafter_call_\@:
> +#endif
> +.endm
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index f585df24ab3d..9b49b56efa29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -517,9 +517,7 @@ END(irq_entries_start)
>        */
>       TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> -     call enter_from_user_mode
> -#endif
> +     CALL_ENTER_FROM_USER_MODE
>  
>  1:
>       /*
> @@ -1058,9 +1056,7 @@ ENTRY(error_entry)
>  
>  .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
>       TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> -     call enter_from_user_mode
> -#endif
> +     CALL_ENTER_FROM_USER_MODE
>       ret

Yeah, so I only have a really minor syntactic nit abou tthis: it's OK to 
capitalize things when doing macros, but here I don't think capitalizing the 
called function name is good - I think the following would be more obvious:

        CALL_enter_from_user_mode

this makes it really, really obvious (to me!) that this macro is a shortcut for:

        call enter_from_user_mode

with some glue around it, and I could grep for 'enter_from_user_mode' 
immediately 
- while grepping for ENTER_FROM_USER_MODE would miss the called function.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to