H. Peter Anvin, le Wed 06 Dec 2006 07:26:44 -0800, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > >H. Peter Anvin, le Wed 06 Dec 2006 07:16:39 -0800, a écrit : > >>Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>>>Is there any way to fix this? Glibc people don't seem to want to fix it > >>>>on their part, see > >>>>http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>Ulrich asked you to go to us once your time travel machine was > >>>finished.. is it finished yet ? ;=) > >>> > >>>this is part of the ABI, so we can't change this in 2006... > >>> > >>If ENOTSUP is currently unused and is only there for completeness, then > >>it should be fine to add it. > > > >The functions that should be returning it instead of EOPNOTSUP should be > >fixed too. > > > > The two can't be done at the same time. In fact, the two probably can't > be done without a period of quite a few *years* between them.
Not a reason for not doing it ;) Samuel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
