On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:47:20PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > +           if (rc && rc != -ENOENT) {
> > +                   tpm_chip_unregister(chip);
> > +                   return rc;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> 
> This is still goofy looking, the list_add_tail_rcu should be the last
> thing done and cannot fail. Just code this with the usual goto based
> unwind and goto to do tpm_dev_del_device for the above failure.

Agreed that this would be cleaner.

> > +
> >     return 0;
> >  out_err:
> >     tpm1_chip_unregister(chip);
> 
> Which avoids calling tpm1_chip_unregister and tpm_chip_unregister in
> the same function, which looks so wrong to a casual read..

I'm not going to change the current patch at this point of release
cycle but this clean up definitely makes sense later on.

> Jason

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to