Jean-Paul Saman wrote: > > In populate_rootfs() the printk on line 554. It says "Unpacking > initramfs..", which is confusing because if that line is reached the code > has already decided that the image is an initrd image.
Are you sure? > The printk is thus > wrong in stating that it is unpacking an "initramfs". It should says > "initrd" instead. The attached patch corrects this typo. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Saman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c > index d28c109..f6020db 100644 > --- a/init/initramfs.c > +++ b/init/initramfs.c > @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM This is where initramfs is discerned from initrd, as both are available. > free_initrd(); > } > #else Otherwise it's initramfs only. > - printk(KERN_INFO "Unpacking initramfs..."); > + printk(KERN_INFO "Unpacking initrd..."); > err = unpack_to_rootfs((char *)initrd_start, > initrd_end - initrd_start, 0); > if (err) > > - Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
