Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 16:14 +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> This adds a driver for the Aurora VLSI NB8800 Ethernet controller.
>> It is an almost complete rewrite of a driver originally found in
>> a Sigma Designs 2.6.22 tree.
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +static void nb8800_receive(struct net_device *dev, int i, int len)
>> +{
>> +    struct nb8800_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +    struct nb8800_rx_desc *rxd = &priv->rx_descs[i];
>> +    struct page *page = priv->rx_bufs[i].page;
>> +    int offset = priv->rx_bufs[i].offset;
>> +    void *data = page_address(page) + offset;
>> +    dma_addr_t dma = rxd->desc.s_addr;
>> +    struct sk_buff *skb;
>> +    int size;
>> +    int err;
>> +
>> +    size = len <= RX_COPYBREAK ? len : RX_COPYHDR;
>> +
>> +    skb = napi_alloc_skb(&priv->napi, size);
>> +    if (!skb) {
>> +            netdev_err(dev, "rx skb allocation failed\n");
>> +            dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>> +            return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (len <= RX_COPYBREAK) {
>> +            dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&dev->dev, dma, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> +            memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), data, len);
>> +            dma_sync_single_for_device(&dev->dev, dma, len,
>> +                                       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> +    } else {
>> +            err = nb8800_alloc_rx(dev, i, true);
>> +            if (err) {
>> +                    netdev_err(dev, "rx buffer allocation failed\n");
>> +                    dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>> +                    return;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            dma_unmap_page(&dev->dev, dma, RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> +            memcpy(skb_put(skb, RX_COPYHDR), data, RX_COPYHDR);
>> +            skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, page,
>> +                            offset + RX_COPYHDR, len - RX_COPYHDR,
>> +                            RX_BUF_SIZE);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
>> +    netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Any reason you do not use napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb) instead of
> netif_receive_skb() ?

Because I haven't been following the netdev list closely for the last
five years, and no documentation I read mentioned this function.  I can
certainly change it.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
m...@mansr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to