Thomas, On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:23:29 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the > > right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is > > a (hopefully) better long term solution. > > Agreed. > > I'll go over the proposed solution tomorrow afternoon (I'm > traveling/conferencing...) Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution. Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach in mind. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
