On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:49:40AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:23:10PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hi > > > > I recently ran into TASKS_RCU() and wondered why we can't use normal > > coding patterns to do the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > > Well, I cannot get too excited either way, but the diffstat for this > change is not particularly favorable.
It also doesn't build with TASKS_RCU enabled it turns out. But the point is, nowhere else do we use this pattern. We always provide functions. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
