On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Pavel Fedin <p.fe...@samsung.com> wrote: > Hello! > >> > +- samsung,srom-timing : array of 6 integers, specifying bank timings in >> > the >> > + following order: Tacp, Tcah, Tcoh, Tacc, Tcos, >> > Tacs. >> > + Each value is specified in cycles and has the >> > following >> > + meaning and valid range: >> > + Tacp : Page mode access cycle at Page mode (0 - >> > 15) >> > + Tcah : Address holding time after CSn (0 - 15) >> > + Tcoh : Chip selection hold on OEn (0 - 15) >> > + Tacc : Access cycle (0 - 31, the actual time is N >> > + 1) >> > + Tcos : Chip selection set-up before OEn (0 - 15) >> > + Tacs : Address set-up before CSn (0 - 15) >> >> This is not easily extended. Perhaps a property per value instead. > > We had a discussion with Krzysztof about it, he agreed with this form of the > property. > My concern was that it's just too much typing, and makes little sense because > these > settings always go together. If register layout changes, or parameter set > changes in > incompatible way, then it's another device, not exynos-srom anymore. > So would you agree with that, or is your position strong?
I'm thinking for a new version of the controller which could add (or remove) new timing parameters, but then I guess you can interpret the field differently based on the compatible string. Anyway, your problem to deal with. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
