Hi Linus,
My for-linus-4.4 branch is ready for pulling:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git
for-linus-4.4
Some of this got cherry-picked from a github repo this week, but I
verified the patches. We have three small scrub cleanups and a
collection of fixes.
Zhao Lei (9) commits (+97/-122):
btrfs: Use scrub_checksum_data and scrub_checksum_tree_block for
scrub_recheck_block_checksum (+36/-94)
btrfs: Reset sblock->xxx_error stats before calling
scrub_recheck_block_checksum (+4/-0)
btrfs: scrub: set error stats when tree block spanning stripes (+6/-0)
btrfs: Reduce unnecessary arguments in scrub_recheck_block (+8/-20)
btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by auto removing bg (+5/-2)
btrfs: Use fs_info directly in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs (+2/-2)
btrfs: scrub: setup all fields for sblock_to_check (+12/-0)
btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg (+21/-0)
btrfs: Remove len argument from scrub_find_csum (+3/-4)
Filipe Manana (6) commits (+61/-25):
Btrfs: fix race leading to incorrect item deletion when dropping extents
(+12/-4)
Btrfs: fix race leading to BUG_ON when running delalloc for nodatacow
(+8/-2)
Btrfs: fix sleeping inside atomic context in qgroup rescan worker (+0/-1)
Btrfs: fix extent accounting for partial direct IO writes (+37/-15)
Btrfs: fix race waiting for qgroup rescan worker (+1/-2)
Btrfs: fix race when listing an inode's xattrs (+3/-1)
Justin Maggard (1) commits (+9/-3):
btrfs: qgroup: exit the rescan worker during umount
Total: (16) commits (+167/-150)
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 +
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 11 +--
fs/btrfs/file.c | 16 +++--
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 62 ++++++++++++-----
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 13 ++--
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 ++++++
fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 4 +-
8 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
