Yes, I merged the code, but looking deeper at phy its clear I missed
some things.
Looking into libphy's workqueue stuff, it has the following sequence:
disable interrupts
schedule_work()
... time passes ...
... workqueue routine is called ...
enable interrupts
handle interrupt
I really have to question if a workqueue was the best choice of
direction for such a sequence. You don't want to put off handling an
interrupt, with interrupts disabled, for a potentially unbounded amount
of time.
Maybe the best course of action is to mark it with CONFIG_BROKEN until
it gets fixed.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
