On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:21:47 +0800
yalin wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> i have not tried ,
> just a question,
> if you print a %s , but don’t call trace_define_field() do define this string
> in
> __entry , how does user space perf tool to get this string info and print it
> ?
> i am curious ..
> i can try this when i have time. and report to you .
Because the print_fmt has nothing to do with the fields. You can have
as your print_fmt as:
TP_printk("Message = %s", "hello dolly!")
And both userspace and the kernel with process that correctly (if I got
string processing working in userspace, which I believe I do). The
string is processed, it's not dependent on TP_STRUCT__entry() unless it
references a field there. Which can also be used too:
TP_printk("Message = %s", __entry->musical ? "Hello dolly!" :
"Death Trap!")
userspace will see in the entry:
print_fmt: "Message = %s", REC->musical ? "Hello dolly!" : "Death Trap!"
as long as the field "musical" exists, all is well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
