On Wednesday 18 November 2015 00:16:46 Yury Norov wrote:
>
> +/* For ILP32, sigset should be the same size fields as LP64 so use
> + unsigned long long. */
> +#ifdef __ILP32__
> +#define __SIGSET_INNER_TYPE __extension__ unsigned long long
> +#define _NSIG_BPW 64
> +
> +# ifdef __AARCH64EB__
> +# define __SIGNAL_INNER(type, field) \
> + __extension__ struct { \
> + int __pad_##field; \
> + type field; \
> + } __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> +# else
> +# define __SIGNAL_INNER(type, field) \
> + __extension__ struct { \
> + type field; \
> + int __pad_##field; \
> + } __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> +# endif
> +
> +# define __SIGACTION_HANDLER(field) \
> + __SIGNAL_INNER(__sighandler_t, field)
> +
> +#define __SIGACTION_FLAGS(field) \
> + __extension__ unsigned long long field
> +
> +#define __SIGACTION_RESTORER(field) \
> + __SIGNAL_INNER(__sigrestore_t, field)
> +
> +#endif
Ah, I missed that in the comments for patch 14. I would think that
it makes sense to share siginfo_t with the 64-bit version, when the
normal compat_siginfo_t doesn't work, but I see no point in
changing compat_sigset_t: There is nothing architecture specific
in that, so you can just use the arm32 version of that, which simplifies
both the kernel and libc sides.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
