On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 18/11/15 16:03, Ray Jui wrote:
On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
Add device tree entries for clock support for Broadcom Northstar 2 SoC
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonma...@broadcom.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi | 80
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
index 9610822..a510d3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
*/
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm-ns2.h>
/memreserve/ 0x84b00000 0x00000008;
@@ -109,6 +110,33 @@
<&A57_3>;
};
+ clocks {
Is this a new convention? That is, group all clocks without a base
register address in a node named "clocks", but at the same time, put all
other clocks with base register address under a bus node.
I do not think that is new, lots of platforms do that. The clock
providers/controllers would typically be in the 'bus' nodes because it
has a register interface, while the synthetic clocks would be under
'clocks'.
Okay that's very good to know. Thanks!
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
