On Thursday 19 November 2015 18:44:57 Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > >> > >> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little > >> patches that didn't make it for -rc1. > >> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some > >> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible > >> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree). > >> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late > >> like > >> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig > >> option. > >> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion > >> worth > >> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste. > >> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated. > >> > >> Tell me if it's okay for you. > > > > I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back > > myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait > > for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had. > > I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this > pull-request would be preferred.
It is, but if you have a branch that introduces or exposes a bug, then I'd prefer to get a pull request with the bug fixes on top of the branch that we already have, e.g. the at91/dt branch (as opposed to next/dt or for-next, which would be wrong). Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/