On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:24AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Toshiba laptops with WWAN devices installed cannot use the device unless
> it is attached and powered, similar to how Toshiba Bluetooth devices
> work.
> 
> This patch adds support to WWAN devices, introducing three functions,
> one to query the overall status of the wireless devices (RFKill, WLAN,
> BT, WWAN), the second queries WWAN support, and finally the third
> (de)activates the device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koes...@bringnow.com>
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscef...@gmail.com>

Thanks Azael,

A few comments on code flow and one bug I think below.

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 92 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index c013029..60d1ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define HCI_VIDEO_OUT                        0x001c
>  #define HCI_HOTKEY_EVENT             0x001e
>  #define HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS           0x002a
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS                 0x0056
>  #define HCI_ACCELEROMETER            0x006d
>  #define HCI_KBD_ILLUMINATION         0x0095
>  #define HCI_ECO_MODE                 0x0097
> @@ -148,6 +149,10 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_ON                      0x8
>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_OFF             0x10
>  #define SCI_KBD_TIME_MAX             0x3c001a
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS          0x1
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN            0x3
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS     0x2000
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER              0x4000
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_MODE_MASK     0xff
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_DISABLED              0x00
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_ALTERNATE     0x09
> @@ -197,12 +202,14 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>       unsigned int kbd_function_keys_supported:1;
>       unsigned int panel_power_on_supported:1;
>       unsigned int usb_three_supported:1;
> +     unsigned int wwan_supported:1;
>       unsigned int sysfs_created:1;
>       unsigned int special_functions;
>  
>       bool kbd_led_registered;
>       bool illumination_led_registered;
>       bool eco_led_registered;
> +     bool killswitch;
>  };
>  
>  static struct toshiba_acpi_dev *toshiba_acpi;
> @@ -1085,6 +1092,87 @@ static int toshiba_hotkey_event_type_get(struct 
> toshiba_acpi_dev *dev,
>       return -EIO;
>  }
>  
> +/* Wireless status (RFKill, WLAN, BT, WWAN) */
> +static int toshiba_wireless_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +     acpi_status status;
> +
> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS;
> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +             pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS) {
> +             dev->killswitch =
> +                         (out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS) ? true : false;

This should assign successfully without the need for the ternary operator. You
can also then drop the extra newline. You can always use:

!!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS)

To ensure a 1 or 0 assignment.

> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     return -EIO;

Also, we should be testing for error and do the expected path outside the if
blocks.


        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) {
                pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
                return -EIO;
        }

        if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
                return -ENODEV;
        
        if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)
                return -EIO;
        
        dev->killswitch = !!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS);

        return 0;

> +}
> +
> +/* WWAN */
> +static void toshiba_wwan_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +     acpi_status status;
> +
> +     dev->wwan_supported = 0;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * WWAN support can be queried by setting the in[3] value to
> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN (0x03).
> +      *
> +      * If supported, out[0] contains TOS_SUCCESS and out[2] contains
> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS (0x2000).
> +      *
> +      * If not supported, out[0] contains TOS_INPUT_DATA_ERROR (0x8300)
> +      * or TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED (0x8000).
> +      */
> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +             pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
> +     else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS && out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS)
> +             dev->wwan_supported = 1;

This block similarly intermixes error checking with the primary functional
logic, making it less legible in my opinion. Consider:


        in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
        status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);

        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)) {
                pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
                return;
        }

        dev->wwan_supported = (out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS);

> +}
> +
> +static int toshiba_wwan_set(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 state)
> +{
> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_SET, HCI_WIRELESS, state, 0, 0, 0 };
> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +     acpi_status status;
> +
> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS;
> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +             pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN status failed\n");
> +             return -EIO;
> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +     } else if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS) {
> +             return -EIO;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Some devices only need to call HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS to
> +      * (de)activate the device, but some others need the
> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER call as well.
> +      */
> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER;
> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +             pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN power failed\n");

I believe you want a return -EIO here?

> +     else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     return out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EIO;

So much ternary! :-) I suppose this one is OK.

> +}
> +
>  /* Transflective Backlight */
>  static int get_tr_backlight_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 *status)
>  {
> @@ -2561,6 +2649,8 @@ static void print_supported_features(struct 
> toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>               pr_cont(" panel-power-on");
>       if (dev->usb_three_supported)
>               pr_cont(" usb3");
> +     if (dev->wwan_supported)
> +             pr_cont(" wwan");
>  
>       pr_cont("\n");
>  }
> @@ -2736,6 +2826,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device 
> *acpi_dev)
>       ret = get_fan_status(dev, &dummy);
>       dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>  
> +     toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
> +
>       print_supported_features(dev);
>  
>       ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->acpi_dev->dev.kobj,
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to