Hi Stefan, On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote: > Currently, if the resource table is completely missing in the > firmware, powering up the remoteproc fails silently. Add a message > indicating that the resource table is missing in the firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>
Applied to remoteproc-next, thanks. > This also opens up a more general question: Is it mandatory to have > a resource table in the firmware? The implementation we have today does require it, but that's just because this is what we had to support so far. > Theoretically a remoteproc could > also work completely independent, all what would be used from the > remoteproc framework is the loading and starting capabilities... Sure. Feel free to add support for your hardware as needed. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/