* Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:

> So if an overwrite-mode background tracing session is running, you don't even 
> have 
> to signal it to capture the ring-buffer: just open the ring-buffer fd in 
> procfs, 
> under /proc/XYZ/perf/ring-buffers/5.trace or so, and dump its current 
> contents, 
> assuming the task doing that has sufficient permissions - i.e. 
> ptrace_may_access().
> 
> We could even pretty-print some very basic version of the records from the 
> kernel, 
> via /proc/XYZ/perf/ring-buffers/5.txt, to support a tooling-less tracing 
> modes. 
> This way perf based tracing could be supported even on systems that have no 
> writable filesystems.

With this 'cat' could be used to look at the current trace:

        cat /proc/XYZ/perf/ring-buffers/5.txt

would result in 'perf script' alike output generated by the kernel:

  $ cat /proc/XYZ/perf/ring-buffers/5.txt
            perf 24816 63796.780079:          1 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
            perf 24816 63796.780083:          1 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
            perf 24816 63796.780086:          8 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
            perf 24816 63796.780089:         97 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
            perf 24816 63796.780092:       1237 cycles:pp:  ffffffff8103450c 
intel_pmu_handle_irq
            perf 24816 63796.780094:      13879 cycles:pp:  ffffffff81204f23 
setup_new_exec
              sh 24816 63796.780104:     170378 cycles:pp:  ffffffff811bc437 
change_protection_range
              sh 24816 63796.780145:     698206 cycles:pp:  ffffffff813d22d7 
clear_page_c_e
              sh 24816 63796.780304:    1145748 cycles:pp:      7f60aca20bdb 
_dl_addr
              sh 24817 63796.780400:          1 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
              sh 24817 63796.780403:          1 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
              sh 24817 63796.780406:         10 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe
              sh 24817 63796.780409:        118 cycles:pp:  ffffffff810603f8 
native_write_msr_safe

... and you could use shell scripting to analyze it - just like with ftrace.

of course this would be simplified output - and you could still access or copy 
the 
raw trace data as well, and use all the rich tooling and visualization features 
of 
full perf.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to