On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Konstantin Shkolnyy
> <[email protected]> wrote:

>> +static bool cp210x_tx_empty(struct usb_serial_port *port)
>> +{
>> +       int err;
>> +       u32 count;
>> +
>> +       err = cp210x_get_tx_queue_byte_count(port, &count);
>
>> +       if (!err && count)
>> +               return false;
>> +
>> +       return true;
>
> return err || !count;

To me, expressing it like this is harder to read. The code as I wrote
it, in my mind, reads like this:

if successfully read the counter and it's not 0 then
   tx is not empty, return false

> Btw, can be count left uninitialized?

When the function succeeds it assigns a value to count.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to