On Fri 27-11-15 17:40:41, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 04:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Thu 12-11-15 10:53:01, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>On Wed 11-11-15 15:13:53, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>this has been posted previously as a part of larger GFP_NOFS related
> >>>patch set
> >>>(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-1-git-send-email-mhocko%40kernel.org)
> >>>but I think it makes sense to discuss it even out of that scope.
> >>>
> >>>I would like to hear FS and other MM people about the proposed interface.
> >>>Using mapping_gfp_mask blindly doesn't sound good to me and vm_fault
> >>>looks like a proper channel to communicate between MM and FS layers.
> >>>
> >>>Comments? Are there any better ideas?
> >>
> >>Makes sense to me and the filesystems I know should be fine with this
> >>(famous last words ;). Feel free to add:
> >>
> >>Acked-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> >
> >Thanks a lot! Are there any objections from other fs/mm people?
>
> Please replace "GFP_IOFS" in the subject, as the "flag" has been removed
> recently. Otherwise
Done.
mm: Allow GFP_{FS,IO} for page_cache_read page cache allocation
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Thanks
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/