On Tuesday 01 December 2015 16:53:01 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:45:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 December 2015 16:40:57 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
> > > - for (i = 1; rdev->supply; rdev = rdev->supply->rdev, i++)
> > > + for (i = 1; rdev; rdev = rdev->supply->rdev, i++)
> > > mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i);
>
> > I think now we have a double lock, the initial mutex_lock() needs to
> > be removed again.
>
> Ugh, I even made that fix before I sent but didn't actually commit it
>
I'm glad I'm not the only one who can screw up a trivial one-line
fix to this damned function. ;-)
I'm still leading with three stupid mistakes over your one though.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
