On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:57:03PM +0800, Xinwei Kong wrote: > This patch adds all I2C nodes for the Hi6220 SoC. This hi6220 Soc > use this I2C IP of Synopsys Designware for HiKey board. > > Signed-off-by: Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxin...@hisilicon.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 37 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi > index 82d2488..85d4a8b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi > @@ -208,5 +208,42 @@ > clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + i2c0: i2c@f7100000 { > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; > + reg = <0x0 0xf7100000 0x0 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 44 4>; > + clocks = <&sys_ctrl HI6220_I2C0_CLK>; > + clock-names = "clk_i2c0";
Neither bindings doc i2c-designware.txt defines this property, nor kernel i2c-designware driver uses this property. So I think this clock-names property can just be dropped. Otherwise, the patch looks good to me. Shawn > + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <300>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_pmx_func &i2c0_cfg_func>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + i2c1: i2c@f7101000 { > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; > + reg = <0x0 0xf7101000 0x0 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 45 4>; > + clocks = <&sys_ctrl HI6220_I2C1_CLK>; > + clock-names = "clk_i2c1"; > + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <300>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pmx_func &i2c1_cfg_func>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + i2c2: i2c@f7102000 { > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; > + reg = <0x0 0xf7102000 0x0 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 46 4>; > + clocks = <&sys_ctrl HI6220_I2C2_CLK>; > + clock-names = "clk_i2c2"; > + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <300>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c2_pmx_func &i2c2_cfg_func>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > }; > }; > -- > 1.9.1 > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/