> > I agree. We have multiplatform dove already, it is in mach-mvebu. Do > > we really need both mach-dove and mach-mvebu dove in one kernel? > > I'm also fine with deleting mach-dove.
Ah, maybe i worded that badly. By "in one kernel" i mean kernel binary. We should keep mach-dove, and allow a mach-dove build of the kernel. But there is no reason for that build to be multi-platform. We already have multi-platform dove via mvebu. Anyway, i see your v2 patches do leave mach-dove as a single platform kernel. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/