* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:10:28 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > +#define seqlock_init(x)                                    \
> > +   do {                                            \
> > +           (x)->sequence = 0;                      \
> > +           spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);             \
> > +   } while (0)
> 
> This does not have to be a macro, does it?

Maybe it could be an __always_inline inline function (it has to be 
inlined to get the callsite based lock class key right) - but i'm not 
sure about the include file dependencies. Will probably work out fine as 
seqlock.h is supposed to be a late one in the order of inclusion - but i 
didnt want to make a blind bet.

        Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to