On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > No argument here, but the overhead of reloading CR3 period will kill > performance. [...] 2.4 does not reload CR3, unless you are using multiple user-space processes. > 2.4 does not beat NetWare, BTW, it gets a little further, but still > hits the wall, [...] as i told you in the previous mail, the main overhead is not CR3, it's the copying & dirtying of all data, and the subsequent DMA-initiated dirty cacheline writeback. I can serve 100 MB/sec web content with 2.4 & TUX just fine - it relies on a zero-copying infrastructure. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks... Andrea Arcangeli