* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this, why
> > not
> > just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is meant to be our most precise
> > event.
>
> I requested this because the PREC_DIST events can only be scheduled on a
> single
> counter, whereas the existing :pp events can be had on all 4.
>
> This mean you can have 2 concurrent :pp users (without RR), but not :ppp.
Ok. Will tooling do the right thing? I.e. will the first user of 'perf top' get
:ppp automatically, while the second one falls back to :pp?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
