On Wednesday December 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > NeilBrown wrote: > > Following are 14 patches for knfsd that are suitable for inclusion in > > 2.6.20. > > First 13 are from Chuck Lever and make preparations for IPv6 support (I > > think we've > > get them right this time). > > > > Last is from Peter Staubach and fixes and issue with exclusive create > > interacting badly with some ACLs. > > > Any word on this 2.6.19 oops? > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/8/110
Not yet... I've been spending my spare time looking for an md oops :-) A quick look suggests that it cannot possibly happen ... cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue appears to be being called with a bad "struct workqueue_struct *". But that really must have been initialised when the first nfsd thread started... It looks like cwq in flush_cpu_workqueue is 0x0000040000000100. Is that the sort of address you would expect? Where do alloc_percpu data structures live? The '4' wouldn't be a single-bit memory error, would it? (that would be too easy). So: no, no real progress. Is it repeatable? NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
