On 12/07/2015 05:31 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> Great. Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your >> verity FEC support regression tests into cryptsetup's tests. > > Sure. These tests would basically involve generating a valid disk > image, corrupting it up to the theoretical maximum, and verifying that > dm-verity can correct it.
Does the code handle/report even the same type of data corruption for RS blocks? Or this is just silently ignored until data area corruption happens? Sorry, I did not study the code here, I am just curious :) (IOW I mean if data are ok but recovery metadata is corrupted.) Milan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
