From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> rcu_dereference_raw() calls indirectly rcu_read_lock_held() while rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() does not so fix the comment about the latter.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index f2b667df1131..85aabcd8b564 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) * The tracing infrastructure traces RCU (we want that), but unfortunately * some of the RCU checks causes tracing to lock up the system. * - * The tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call + * The no-tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call * rcu_read_lock_held(). */ #define rcu_dereference_raw_notrace(p) __rcu_dereference_check((p), 1, __rcu) -- 2.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/