On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote:
> With the introduction of cpu capacity bindings, CPU capacities can now be
> extracted from DT. Add parsing of such information at boot time. We keep
> code that can produce same information, based on different DT properties
> and hard-coded values, as fall-back for backward compatibility.

This patch-set should define _one_ way to be able to specify
heterogeneous cpu capacity values for all arm and arm64 systems. So I
would really like that we can agree on this solution ('capacity'
property) and delete the old (cortex-a[15,7] only) solution based on
struct cpu_efficiency table_efficiency[] and 'clock-frequency' property
in arch/arm/kernel/topology.c. The appropriate code in
arch/arm[,64]/kernel/topology.c should be the same. Everything else is
highly confusing.

> 
> Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 50 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index ec279d1..ecbff03 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,35 @@ static unsigned long *__cpu_capacity;
>  #define cpu_capacity(cpu)    __cpu_capacity[cpu]
>  
>  static unsigned long middle_capacity = 1;
> +static bool capacity_from_dt = true;
> +static u32 capacity_scale = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +
> +static int __init parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> +{
> +     int ret = 1;
> +     u32 cpu_capacity;
> +
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(cpu_node,
> +                                "capacity",
> +                                &cpu_capacity);
> +     if (!ret) {
> +             u64 capacity;
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Enforce capacity <= capacity-scale.
> +              */
> +             cpu_capacity = cpu_capacity <= capacity_scale ? cpu_capacity :
> +                     capacity_scale;
> +             capacity = (cpu_capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) /
> +                     capacity_scale;
> +
> +             set_capacity_scale(cpu, capacity);
> +             pr_info("CPU%d: DT cpu capacity %lu\n",
> +                     cpu, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu));
> +     }
> +
> +     return !ret;
> +}
>  
>  /*
>   * Iterate all CPUs' descriptor in DT and compute the efficiency
> @@ -99,6 +128,18 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>       __cpu_capacity = kcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*__cpu_capacity),
>                                GFP_NOWAIT);
>  
> +     cn = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> +     if (!cn) {
> +             pr_err("No CPU information found in DT\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(cn, "capacity-scale", &capacity_scale))
> +             pr_info("DT cpus capacity-scale %u\n", capacity_scale);
> +     else
> +             pr_debug("DT cpus capacity-scale not found: assuming %u\n",
> +                     capacity_scale);
> +
>       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>               const u32 *rate;
>               int len;
> @@ -110,6 +151,13 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>                       continue;
>               }
>  
> +             if (parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu)) {
> +                     of_node_put(cn);
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
> +             capacity_from_dt = false;
> +
>               for (cpu_eff = table_efficiency; cpu_eff->compatible; cpu_eff++)
>                       if (of_device_is_compatible(cn, cpu_eff->compatible))
>                               break;
> @@ -160,7 +208,7 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>   */
>  static void update_cpu_capacity(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -     if (!cpu_capacity(cpu))
> +     if (!cpu_capacity(cpu) || capacity_from_dt)
>               return;
>  
>       set_capacity_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to