On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > Russell King wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > > > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime > > > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data, > > > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there > > > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected > > > and that worked). > > > > > > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> > > > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> > > > > > > (and please don't forget to cc stable) > > > > I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue > > that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive > > domain register setting into the switched-to context. > > > > Can you test this patch please? Thanks. > > Still looking good.
Does that mean I can add your reported and tested-by to this latest patch? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/