On 12/09/15 at 12:08am, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of list_for_each_safe() to
> simplify the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@163.com>
> ---
>  kernel/kexec_core.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> index 11b64a6..f3951c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -310,12 +310,9 @@ static void kimage_free_pages(struct page *page)
>  
>  void kimage_free_page_list(struct list_head *list)
>  {
> -     struct list_head *pos, *next;
> +     struct page *page, *next;
>  
> -     list_for_each_safe(pos, next, list) {
> -             struct page *page;
> -
> -             page = list_entry(pos, struct page, lru);
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, list, lru) {

A small improvement, seems better. Ack it.

Please also send kexec mailing list if you have kexec related patchs so
that more people are attracted:

ke...@lists.infradead.org

Acked-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>

Thanks
Baoquan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to