On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:35:59 +0100 Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> This bpf_verifier_ops structure is never modified, like the other > bpf_verifier_ops structures, so declare it as const. > > Done with the help of Coccinelle. Thanks, I'll add this to my 4.5 queue. -- Steve > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]> > > --- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > index 4228fd3..45dd798 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static bool kprobe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int > size, enum bpf_access_type > return true; > } > > -static struct bpf_verifier_ops kprobe_prog_ops = { > +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops kprobe_prog_ops = { > .get_func_proto = kprobe_prog_func_proto, > .is_valid_access = kprobe_prog_is_valid_access, > }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
