On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:54:11PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> What CONFIG_INET and CONFIG_LEGACY_KMEM guard inside the memory
> controller code is insignificant, having these conditionals is not
> worth the complication and fragility that comes with them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@virtuozzo.com>
> @@ -4374,17 +4342,11 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct
> cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !cgroup_memory_nosocket)
> static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
> -#endif
> -
> - memcg_free_kmem(memcg);
I wonder where the second call to memcg_free_kmem comes from. Luckily,
it couldn't result in a breakage. And now it's removed.
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_LEGACY_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
> if (memcg->tcp_mem.active)
> static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
> -#endif
>
> memcg_free_kmem(memcg);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
