If signal-driven i/o is disabled while write wakeup is pending (ie.,
n_tty_write() has set TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP but then signal-driven i/o
is disabled), the TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP bit will never be cleared and
will cause tty_wakeup() to always call n_tty_write_wakeup.

Unconditionally clear the write wakeup, and since kill_fasync()
already checks if the fasync ptr is null, call kill_fasync()
unconditionally as well.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
---
 drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
index e695f8f..5034da0 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ static ssize_t chars_in_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty)
 
 static void n_tty_write_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-       if (tty->fasync && test_and_clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags))
-               kill_fasync(&tty->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+       clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
+       kill_fasync(&tty->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 }
 
 static void n_tty_check_throttle(struct tty_struct *tty)
-- 
2.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to