The "dual_image" and "inactive_flag" fields should be merged into a single
"image_sequence" field.

Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <si...@fire.lp0.eu>
---
v4: New patch.

 include/linux/bcm963xx_tag.h | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bcm963xx_tag.h b/include/linux/bcm963xx_tag.h
index 08e0133..161c7b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bcm963xx_tag.h
+++ b/include/linux/bcm963xx_tag.h
@@ -12,8 +12,7 @@
 #define CHIPID_LEN             6       /* Chip Id Length */
 #define IMAGE_LEN              10      /* Length of Length Field */
 #define ADDRESS_LEN            12      /* Length of Address field */
-#define DUALFLAG_LEN           2       /* Dual Image flag Length */
-#define INACTIVEFLAG_LEN       2       /* Inactie Flag Length */
+#define IMAGE_SEQUENCE_LEN     4       /* Image sequence Length */
 #define RSASIG_LEN             20      /* Length of RSA Signature in tag */
 #define TAGINFO1_LEN           30      /* Length of vendor information field1 
in tag */
 #define FLASHLAYOUTVER_LEN     4       /* Length of Flash Layout Version 
String tag */
@@ -72,10 +71,10 @@ struct bcm_tag {
        char kernel_address[ADDRESS_LEN];
        /* 128-137: Size of kernel */
        char kernel_length[IMAGE_LEN];
-       /* 138-139: Unused at the moment */
-       char dual_image[DUALFLAG_LEN];
-       /* 140-141: Unused at the moment */
-       char inactive_flag[INACTIVEFLAG_LEN];
+       /* 138-141: Image sequence number
+        * (to be incremented when flashed with a new image)
+        */
+       char image_sequence[IMAGE_SEQUENCE_LEN];
        /* 142-161: RSA Signature (not used; some vendors may use this) */
        char rsa_signature[RSASIG_LEN];
        /* 162-191: Compilation and related information (not used in OpenWrt) */
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
Simon Arlott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to