On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:33:58AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:18:10PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > SNIP > > > > > typedef int (*config_fn_t)(const char *, const char *, void *); > > extern int perf_default_config(const char *, const char *, void *); > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/exec_cmd.c b/tools/perf/util/exec_cmd.c > > index 1099e92..84f9dc5 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/exec_cmd.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/exec_cmd.c > > @@ -5,19 +5,33 @@ > > #include <string.h> > > > > #define MAX_ARGS 32 > > +#define UNDEFINED "UNDEFINED" > > > > static const char *argv_exec_path; > > static const char *argv0_path; > > > > +static const char *cfg_exec_name = UNDEFINED; > > +static const char *cfg_prefix = UNDEFINED; > > +static const char *cfg_exec_path = UNDEFINED; > > +static const char *cfg_exec_path_env = UNDEFINED; > > so instead of forcing each object to hold some subset > of cfg_* configuration, why not create global cfg > object that would carry this data.. cfg_path or so ;-)
Sure, though if it has the config for the entire library, I'd propose a broader name like 'subcmd_cfg'. -- Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/