Em Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:18:14PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> Introduce and use new astrcat() and astrcatf() functions which replace
> the strbuf functionality for subcmd.
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/subcmd-util.h b/tools/perf/util/subcmd-util.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..98fb9f9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/subcmd-util.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +#ifndef __PERF_SUBCMD_UTIL_H
> +#define __PERF_SUBCMD_UTIL_H
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +#define astrcatf(out, fmt, ...)
> \
> +({ \
> + char *tmp = *(out); \
> + if (asprintf((out), "%s" fmt, tmp ?: "", ## __VA_ARGS__) == -1) \
> + die("asprintf failed"); \
> + free(tmp); \
> +})
Hey, don't add die() calls, please.
> +
> +static inline void astrcat(char **out, const char *add)
> +{
> + char *tmp = *out;
> +
> + if (asprintf(out, "%s%s", tmp ?: "", add) == -1)
> + die("asprintf failed");
> +
> + free(tmp);
Ditto.
And I think that this should go into tools/include/string.h and
tools/lib/string.c, no?
We should try to look at the kernel and try to follow naming, semantics,
etc as much as possible. The kernel doesn't have a astrcat, just
kasprintf() (that is in linux/kernel.h, perhaps because in userland
asprintf is in stdio.h, not in string.h) , wonder how something like
astrcat is done there... Doing some research now.
- Arnaldo
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_SUBCMD_UTIL_H */
> --
> 2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
